At & T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I v. TiVo, Inc.

Good Law

774 F. Supp. 2d 1049·2011 WL 794933·2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22938

United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 2011Case C 10-01059 SBACalifornia2,300 words

Opinion

Armstrong, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY PENDING REEXAMINATION

Plaintiffs bring this action against Defendant asserting infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,809,492 (the “'492 Patent”), 5,922,045 (the “'045 Patent”), 6,118,976 (the “'976 Patent”) and 6,983,478 (the “'478 Patent”) (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”). The parties are presently before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination. Dkt. 63. Having read and considered the papers filed in connection with this matter and being fully informed, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Stay. The Court, in its discretion, finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b).

I. BACKGROUND

On March 12, 2010, Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendant asserting infringement of the patents-in-suit. The initial case management conference occurred on June 24, 2010, during which the Court set the claim construction hearing for January 27, 2011. Dkt. 34. No trial date has been set. Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on December 17, 2010. On January 20, 2011, Defendant filed its Answer and Counterclaims, asserting counterclaims seeking declaratory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.