Dragovich

Dragovich v. United States Department of the Treasury

Good Law
764 F. Supp. 2d 1178·2011 WL 175502·107 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 538·111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 726·2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4859
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 201110-01564 CWCalifornia6,959 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilken, J.

ORDER DENYING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 25)

Plaintiffs bring a constitutional challenge to section three of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 1 U.S.C. § 7 , and section 7702B(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.), 26 U.S.C. § 7702B(f), which interfere with their ability to participate in a state-maintained plan providing long-term care insurance. Long-term care insurance provides coverage when a person needs assistance with basic activities of living due to injury, old age, or severe impairments related to chronic illnesses, such as Alzheimer’s disease. Enacted on August 21, 1996, as part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), section 7702B(f) provides favorable federal tax treatment to qualified state-maintained long-term care insurance plans for state employees. 26 U.S.C. § 7702B(f). Section 7702B(f) disqualifies a state-maintained plan from this favorable tax treatment if it provides coverage to individuals other than certain specified relatives of state employees and former employees. § 7702B(f)(2). The provision’s list of eligible relatives does not include registered domestic partners, but does include spouses. 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.