Weinberg

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weinberg

Good Law
287 F. Supp. 2d 1100·2003 WL 22384755·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23557
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 17, 2003CV 02-02084 RSWLCalifornia5,207 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lew, J.

Order For Entry of Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Ancillary Equitable Relief

On March 12, 2002, Plaintiff, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) filed a Complaint to enjoin Mark Weinberg (“Weinberg” or “Defendant”) from further violations of Sections 4b, 4o (1) and 6c of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 6b, 6o (1) and 13a-l (1994). The Court signed a Consent Order of Preliminary Injunction on March 25, 2002 restraining Defendant from violating the Act. On July 5, 2002, Weinberg submitted an Answer. On July 17, 2002, the Court issued a “Notice re Scheduling Conference” (“Notice”). The Notice set October 21, 2002 for a mandatory scheduling conference and reminded parties of their obligation to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan and report to the Court in a manner consistent with F.R.C.P 26. Parties were warned that failure to comply might lead to the imposition of sanctions.

On October 21, 2002, the Court held a mandatory status/scheduling conference at which Weinberg failed to appear. At the conference, Commission counsel advised the Court that Weinberg refused to meet in accordance with F.R.C.P. 26,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.