Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.

Good Law
287 F. Supp. 2d 1118·2003 WL 22501474·57 ERC (BNA) 1995·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23556
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2003CV 96-3281 MMM(RCx)California47,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

Morrow, J.

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF UNOCAL CORPORATION, COUNTY OF LOS ANGE-LES, CITY OF COMPTON, AND CITY OF CARSON; DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF CARSON HARBOR VILLAGE, LTD.; AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF CARSON HARBOR VILLAGE MOBILE HOME PARK, RICHARD BRALEY AND WALKER SMITH

Plaintiff Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. (“Carson Harbor”) is the owner and opera tor of a mobile home park in Carson, California. An undeveloped, open-flow wetlands covers approximately seventeen acres of the mobile home park property. In 1993, while attempting to refinance the property, Carson Harbor discovered hazardous substances contamination. A subsequent environmental assessment revealed tar-like and slag materials in the wetlands.

In 1996, Carson Harbor sued defendants Unocal Corporation (“Unocal”), the City of Compton, the City of Carson, and the County of Los Angeles (“the Government Defendants”); Richard G. Braley, Walker Smith, Jr. and Carson Harbor Village Mobile Home Park (“the Partnership Defendants”); and the California Department of Transportation and W. Van Loben Seis (“Caltrans”). Its complaint alleged claims under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.