Schultz v. Holmes

Good Law
264 F.2d 942·121 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 117·1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5460
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 195915973_1California1,817 words

Opinion

Opinion

264 F.2d 942 121 U.S.P.Q. 117 Mildred Becker SCHULTZ, Appellant, v. Jack HOLMES, Charles Douglas Hone, Lindley A. Jones, Carl Hoefle and Delmar S. Porter, copartners, individually and as copartners doing business under the fictitious firm name and style of Tune Towne Tunes; Hill and Range Songs, Inc., a corporation; Capitol Records, Inc., a corporation; Capitol Records Distributing Corporation, a corporation; Rumbalero Music, Inc., a corporation; Broadcast Music, Inc., a corporation; Columbia Records, Inc., a corporation; Decca Records, Inc., a corporation; Radio Corporation of America, a corporation: Loew's Inc., a corporation, Appellees. No. 15973. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. March 30, 1959. Carl Hoppe, James F. Mitchell, San Francisco, Cal., Thomas P. Mahoney, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Manuel Ruiz, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for Carl Hoefle and Delmar S. Porter, individually and as co-partners d/b/a Tune Towne Tunes, Capitol Records, Inc., Capitol Records Distributing Corp. Gang, Kopp & Tyre, Milton A. Rudin, Payson Wolff, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees Hill & Range Songs, Inc., Rumbalero Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., Decca Records, Inc.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.