Brown

Brown v. Yates

Good Law
753 F. Supp. 2d 1069·2010 WL 4796867·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123128
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 2010Case EDCV 09-0423-VBF(RC)California3,411 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fairbank, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, as well as petitioner’s objections, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing the action with prejudice.

This Court finds an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and that petitioner has not made a substantial showing that he has been denied a constitutional right, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge; accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2) and Fed. R.App. P. 22(b). Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483 , 120 S.Ct. 1595, 1604 , 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Mayfield v. Calderon, 229 F.3d 895, 900 (9th Cir.2000).

IT IS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.