Grand General Accessories Manufacturing v. United Pacific Industries Inc.

Good Law
732 F. Supp. 2d 1014·2010 WL 3155148·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82290
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 2010Case CV 08-07078 DDP (VBKx)California4,342 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

Order (1) Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment in Part (Dkt. No. Ill); (2) Denying Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment in Part (Dkt. No. 103)

Before the Court is Plaintiff Grand General Accessories Manufacturing (“GGAM”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to patent validity, patent infringement, and trade dress infringement, and Defendants United Pacific Industries, Inc. (“UPI”) and Lucidity Enterprise Co. (“Lucidity”) (together “Defendants”)’ Motion for Summary Judgment on all claims.

Plaintiff owns a number of design patents related to automotive stop/tail/turn (“S/T/T”) lights. The feature uniting GGAM’s line of S/T/T lights is a light bulb reflector that the parties refer to as the “web comb design.” The design consists of multiple facets arranged in a grid-like manner on the inner surface of a parabolic reflector, with a light bulb resting in the center of the reflector. GGAM claimed the web comb design (displayed below) in U.S. Design Patent No. 463,590 (the “'590 Patent”), issued in 2002.

[[Image here]]

According to GGAM, its entire series of S/T/T lights is an expansion of the basic design disclosed in the '590 Patent (described in the application as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.