United States v. Real Property Located at 475 Martin Lane

Good Law
727 F. Supp. 2d 876·2010 WL 2850870·106 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5387·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73075
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 2010CV 04-2788 ABC (PLAx), CV 04-3386 ABC (PLAx), CV 05-3910 ABC (PLAx)California4,591 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

ORDER RECONSIDERING DENIAL OF MOTION TO INTERVENE AND PROVIDING CERTAIN RELIEF TO THE KIM CLAIMANTS’ ATTORNEY

The dispute pending before the Court involves federal tax liens issued against property that the Kim Claimants’ attorney argues belong to him. Through the twists and turns of this dispute, the Court previously followed the Government down the rabbit hole into the Wonderland of an Internal Revenue Code wrongful levy action. During that journey it became clear to the Court that it had gone astray. Indeed, the Government eventually argued in the wrongful levy action that the dispute at issue should be adjudicated in this forfeiture action.

For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that: (1) it is appropriate to reconsider its minute order denying the Kim Claimants’ attorney’s motion to intervene (FA Docket No. 654); (2) the Fee Awards ordered by this Court are payable directly to the Kim Claimants’ attorney; and (3) the dispute between the Kim Claimants’ attorney and the Government over priority in the Seized Properties is not ripe for adjudication.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This forfeiture case arises out of a fraud and embezzlement scheme allegedly directed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.