Holmes

Holmes v. TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC, INC.

Good Law
772 F. Supp. 2d 1074·2011 WL 761471·2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17392
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 2011C 09-5781 PJHCalifornia13,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamilton, J.

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The motion of defendants Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. (“THC”), Randall Shaw, and Kristal Gaeta (collectively, the “THC defendants”) for summary judgment, and the motion of defendant Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 (“SEIU,” or “the Union”) for summary judgment, came on for hearing before this court on February 2, 2011. Plaintiff Nathaniel Holmes appeared by his counsel Curtis G. Oler, the THC defendants appeared by their counsel Mark A. White, and the Union appeared by its counsel Vincent Harrington. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS the THC defendants’ motion in part and DENIES it in part, and GRANTS the Union’s motion.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Nathaniel Holmes (“Holmes”) is African-American. He was employed by THC from May 1999 through November 6, 2008, when he was terminated. THC is a nonprofit provider of low-income housing and housing services, including legal services, and is located in the Tenderloin area of San Francisco. THC operates 15 single room occupancy (SRO) hotels, as well as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.