Do-Nguyen

Do-Nguyen v. Clinton

Good Law
100 F. Supp. 2d 1241·2000 WL 854356·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11944
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 2000CIV.00CV0267-L(RBB)California3,366 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lorenz, J.

ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REMAINING MOTIONS AND EX PARTE APPLICATIONS AS MOOT

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants President Clinton, Vice President Gore, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, IRS Commissioner Charles 0. Ros-soti, IRS Tax Exempt Director Steven T. Miller, and the 98 U.S. Senators’ (“Federal Defendants”) motion to dismiss and Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. The Court finds this matter suitable for submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1).

BACKGROUND

On February 8, 2000, Plaintiff, Advoca-tess Mariette Do-Nguyen, filed this action on behalf of the Almighty God, for the Lord Jesus Returned Mission. The Defendants named in the complaint were President Clinton, Vice President Gore, and United States Senators Orrin Hatch, James M. Jeffords, and Jesse Helms.

On March 15, 2000, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, naming as defendants President Clinton, Vice President A1 Gore, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, IRS Commissioner Charles O. Rossoti, IRS Tax Exempt Director Steven T. Miller, Texas Governor George W. Bush, and 98 U.S. Senators. This Complaint alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.