Flores

Flores v. Merced Irrigation District

Bad Law
758 F. Supp. 2d 986·2010 WL 5113050·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130458
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 2010Case CV F 09-1529 LJO DLBCalifornia8,178 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Neill, J.

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

By notice filed on September 15, 2010, Defendant Merced Irrigation District (“MID”) seeks summary judgment or in the alternative summary adjudication pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 on plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff Rodrigo Flores filed an opposition to the motion on October 15, 2010. Defendant filed a reply on November 1, 2010. Pursuant to Local Rule 280(g), this matter was submitted on the pleadings without oral argument and the hearing was vacated. Having considered the moving, the opposition and the reply papers, as well as the Court’s file, the Court issues the following order.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Rodrigo Flores is a Hispanic male who has been employed by Defendant Merced Irrigation District (“MID”) since June 1, 1993. Plaintiff alleges that he earned a B.S. degree in Business and an MBA at C.S.U. Stanislaus for the specific purpose of advancing within MID. Plaintiff alleges that despite his training, education and experience, MID has refused to promote him and kept him in a manual labor position. Plaintiff alleges he suffered discrimination at MID based upon his race, and retaliation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.