Forcier

Forcier v. Microsoft Corp.

Good Law
123 F. Supp. 2d 520·2000 WL 1804600·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17861
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 2000C 99-01989 SBACalifornia7,033 words

Opinion

Opinion

Armstrong, J.

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on (1) the Motion of defendants Aha! Software Corporation (hereinafter “Aha!”) and Greg Stikeleather for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Claims; (2) the Motion of Defendant Microsoft Corporation (hereinafter “Microsoft”) for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts Two and Six; and (3) the Motion of plaintiffs Mitchell D. Forcier and Marathon Development Corporation (hereinafter “Marathon”) for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint. Having read and considered all the papers filed in connection with this motion, having considered the arguments advanced by the parties and being fully informed, the Court GRANTS defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment of plaintiffs’ second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth claims, but DENIES defendant Aha!’s request for sanctions, GRANTS plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to further Amend their complaint to include certain miscellaneous allegations, but DENIES the motion to the extent that plaintiffs seek to include a claim for tortious interference, and GRANTS the parties request for an order permitting defendants to file amended answers and counterclaims.

I.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.