Lacy

Lacy v. Lewis

Good Law
123 F. Supp. 2d 533·2000 WL 1804079·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19929
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 2000CV 99-1798 JSL (RC)California7,736 words

Opinion

Opinion

Letts, J.

ORDER

Having reviewed the papers filed in connection with this matter and being fully apprised of the relevant facts and law,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered granting a conditional writ of habeas corpus, based on petitioner DURNEL LACY’S first claim that the “trial court erred by denying petitioner’s motion for self-representation, violating his California and U.S. Constitutional rights.” The court did not reach the petitioner’s other claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable J. Spencer Letts, United States District Court Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

BACKGROUND

I

On May 8, 1996, in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, a jury convicted petitioner Durnel Lacy, aka Dur-nell Lacy, aka Yerdell Lacy, on one count of possession of rock cocaine in violation of California Health & Safety Code (“H.S.C.”) § 11350(a) (count 1), a felony, and one count of possession of a smoking device in violation of H.S.C. § 11364 (count 2), a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.