Homestake Lead Co. of Missouri v. Doe Run Resources Corp.

Good Law
282 F. Supp. 2d 1131·2003 WL 22160349·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18005
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 2003C 03-0326 MHPCalifornia6,297 words

Opinion

Opinion

Patel, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff Homestake Lead Company (“Homestake”) brings this action against defendant Doe Run Resources Corporation (“Resources”) seeking declaratory relief with respect to Resources’ duty to defend and indemnify Homestake in a series of tort cases. Homestake alleges an obligation on the part of Resources to reimburse outstanding legal expenses and costs, to defend Homestake in ongoing cases, to indemnify Homestake against judgments, settlements, and other adverse payments that may occur in such cases, and to pay Homestake’s costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. Now before the court is Resources’ motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. Before considering the arguments and submissions, however, this court raised sua sponte a jurisdictional question as to whether there was complete diversity among the parties. Now, having considered parties’ responsive papers on the jurisdictional question, as well as all submissions concerning the motion to compel arbitration, and for the reasons set forth below, the court rules as follows. BACKGROUND

On November 1, 1986, Homestake and Resources, then known as St.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.