Rohr Aircraft Corporation and the Franklin C. Wolfe Company, Inc. v. Rubber Teck, Inc., Rubber Teck Sales and Service Co., Paul A. Karres, Otto R. Grass and Joe P. Kerley, Rubber Teck, Inc., Rubber Teck Sales and Service Co., Paul A. Karres, Otto R. Grass and Joe P. Kerley v. Rohr Aircraft Corporation and the Franklin C. Wolfe Company, Inc.

266 F.2d 613 ROHR AIRCRAFT CORPORATION and The Franklin C. Wolfe Company, Inc., Appellants, v. RUBBER TECK, INC., Rubber Teck Sales and Service Co., Paul A. Karres, Otto R. Grass and Joe P. Kerley, Appellees. RUBBER TECK, INC., Rubber Teck Sales and Service Co., Paul A. Karres, Otto R. Grass and Joe P. Kerley, Appellants, v. ROHR AIRCRAFT CORPORATION and The Franklin C. Wolfe Company, Inc., Appellees. No. 15884. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. April 21, 1959. Fulwider, Mattingly & Huntley, John M. Lee, Robert W. Fulwider, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Fred H. Miller, Stanley A. Phipps, Los Angeles, Cal., Alfred D. Williams, Long Beach, Cal., for appellee. Before BARNES, HAMLIN and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. 1 Rohr Aircraft Corporation and The Franklin C. Wolfe Company, Inc., filed an action in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California for a patent infringement and unfair competition against Rubber Teck, Inc., and others. All of the defendants denied the charges, and certain of the defendants, to-wit, Paul A. Karres, Otto R. Grass, and Joe P. Kerley, filed a counterclaim against the plaintiffs for…