Anderson

Anderson v. Continental Casualty Co.

Good Law
258 F. Supp. 2d 1127·2003 WL 1905633
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 2003S-03-145-LKK/JFCalifornia2,403 words

Opinion

Opinion

Karlton, J.

ORDER

Plaintiff brings suit under ERISA for benefits provided for by the Reliance Insurance Company Business Travel Accident Plan. The matter is before the court on defendant Continental Casualty Company’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. I decide the matter on the pleadings and papers on file therein and after a hearing.

I.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Plaintiff worked for Reliance Insurance Company and was covered by its Business Travel Accident Plan (“Plan”), which both parties concede is governed by ERISA. The Plan was established and maintained through the purchase of an insurance policy from defendant and movant in this case, Continental Casualty Company (“CCC”). On September 30, 1998, plaintiff allegedly suffered a fall resulting in severe injuries to her back and left ankle. On November 3, 2000, plaintiff claims that she stopped work due to a total disability resulting from her slip and fall. Finally, on October 16, 2001, plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits.

CCC purportedly denied plaintiffs claim based on a policy provision that required the period of total disability to begin within 365 days after the date of the accident. Plaintiffs alleged total…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.