VFD Consulting, Inc. v. 21ST SERVICES

Good Law
425 F. Supp. 2d 1037·2006 WL 680554·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10511
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 2006C 04-2161 SBA, C 04-2162 SBACalifornia8,152 words

Opinion

Opinion

Armstrong, J.

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants 21st Services, 21st Holdings, and Paul Kirkman’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 96]. Having read and considered the arguments presented by the parties in the papers submitted to the Court, the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing. The Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 96].

BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

1. Parties

Plaintiff VFD Consulting, Inc. (‘VFD”) is a California corporation that conducts business in Mendocino County. Compl. at ¶ 2. VFD is in the business of providing risk assessment research and product development to the life insurance and related industries. Id. at ¶ 7. Vera Dolan is the president and sole owner of VFD. Decl. of Vera Dolan (“Dolan Deck”) at ¶ 1.

Defendants 21st Services and 21st Holdings, LLC (collectively “21st Services”) are businesses operating out of Minnesota. Id. ¶¶ 2-3. Paul Kirkman (“Kirkman”) is the president of 21st Services. Id. ¶ 18; Deck of Paul Kirkman (“Kirkman Deck”) at ¶ 1. 21st Services is in the life insurance settlement (or “viatical”) business. Compl. at ¶ 8. One of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.