Siberell v. United States

Good Law
268 F.2d 61
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 195916215California797 words

Opinion

Opinion

268 F.2d 61 Leslie M. SIBERELL, on Behalf of Himself and His Co-Defendants, Oliver D. Siberell, James P. Siberell, Martha E. Jones, Daisy M. Bishop, and Mabel Robson, Appellants. v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 16215. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 9, 1959. Rehearing Denied August 18, 1959. J. B. Tietz, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants. Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., S. Billingsley Hill, Walter B. Ash, George Swarth, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Herbert M. Weiser, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY, and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The appellants appeal from an order of the district court filed June 4, 1958, denying their motion to vacate a portion of a judgment entered November 1, 1957, awarding compensation for a mining claim condemned by the United States. The mining claim designated in the condemnation proceedings as Parcel 481 is located in San Bernardino County, State of California. 2 The appellants, brothers and sisters, are the heirs at law of their mother, Minnie V. Siberell, and received their interest in the property by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.