Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney Hansen
Opinion
Opinion
Carter, J.
This appeal, in an action for violation of civil rights, presents three major questions:
(1) The sufficiency of the second amended complaint to state a cause of action;
(2) The right to immunity, if any, possessed by state executive officers, and
(3) The impact of the statute of limitations upon the alleged cause.
The defendants below, here appellees, moved to dismiss the second amended complaint of Hoffman on the grounds of, (1) failure to state a claim for relief, and (2) that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations of Oregon.
The trial court entered a judgment of dismissal based on the first ground, failure to state a claim for relief. This appeal followed within the time allowed.
The second amended complaint is set forth in the margin. The case apparent ly grows out of the fact that Hoffman was taken into custody on January 10, 1952 as a mentally ill person and again taken into custody on August 5, 1952 and incarcerated until October 23, 1952, at the Oregon State Hospital for the mentally ill. There is reference to detention in Morningside Hospital but no other information about this hospital is pleaded.