Lal

Lal v. American Home Servicing, Inc.

Good Law
680 F. Supp. 2d 1218·2010 WL 225524·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3487
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20102:09-cv-01585California2,568 words

Opinion

Opinion

England, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Presently before the Court is a Motion by Defendant American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (“Defendant”) to Dismiss portions of the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiffs Parveen A. Lai and Jodi L. Wright (“Plaintiffs”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is granted.

BACKGROUND

Around June 28, 2006, Plaintiffs entered into a mortgage loan for $821,750 with Paramount Equity Mortgage (“Paramount”). The loan was initially serviced by Paramount, but was later serviced by Defendant American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. The mortgage note has since allegedly been sold to an unknown holder. On March 10, 2009, Plaintiffs sent a letter to Defendant stating that they were not provided notice of the right to cancel under TILA, and that pursuant to TILA they were rescinding their loan. Plaintiffs additionally requested that the Defendant indicate its relationship to the loan and identify the true owner of the mortgage note. Plaintiffs also directed Defendant to stop trying to collect on the loan and to cease all future collection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.