Sarei

Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC.

Good Law
221 F. Supp. 2d 1116·2002 WL 1906814·156 Oil & Gas Rep. 403·2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16235
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 2002CIV.00-11695 MMMCalifornia47,314 words

Opinion

Opinion

Morrow, J.

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs, who are current and former residents of the island of Bougainville in Papua New Guinea, filed this putative class action against defendants Rio Tinto pic and Rio Tinto Limited under the Alien Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1350 . Plaintiffs allege that defendants’ mining operations on Bougainville destroyed the island’s environment, harmed the health of its people, and incited a ten-year civil war, during which thousands of civilians died or were injured. They assert that defendants are guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity, as well as racial discrimination and environmental harm that violates international law. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendants contend alternatively that the action should be dismissed on forum non conveniens grounds, because its raises questions that are nonjusticiable under the act of state or political question doctrines, and because the court should abstain under the doctrine of international comity.

I. FACTUAL AND…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.