Marine Cooks & Stewards, Afl v. Panama Steamship Company, Ltd.

Good Law
268 F.2d 935
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 195915637_1California497 words

Opinion

Opinion

268 F.2d 935 MARINE COOKS & STEWARDS, AFL, a voluntary association, James O. Willoughby, Virgil Rogers and Willard Rogers, Appellants, v. PANAMA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Ltd., a corporation, et al., Appellees. No. 15637. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 29, 1959. J. Duane Vance, Seattle, Wash., for appellants. Summers, Bucey & Howard, Charles B. Howard, Seattle, Wash., John D. Mosser, Portland, Or., for appellees. Before POPE, HEALY and ORR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The appeal in this case was from the issuance of a preliminary injunction by the trial court. The function and purpose of a preliminary injunction is to prevent irreparable injury pending an ultimate determination of the action. In the present petition four reasons are set out as grounds for rehearing. Reason designated number 2 was not urged as a specification of error on appeal and was not presented on oral argument. Said ground number 2 is that the picketing complained of was not unlawful even if the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 101 is not applicable. Inasmuch as the ground was not presented on the appeal we decline to entertain it on rehearing but leave it for consideration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.