BYRON M. v. City of Whittier

Good Law
46 F. Supp. 2d 1032·1998 WL 1041269·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21868
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 1998CV 98-8678 ABC MANXCalifornia1,681 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

ORDER RE: TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Plaintiffs Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order came on regularly for hearing before this Court on November 10, 1998. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED in part and denied in part.

The Court, having reviewed the papers relating to Plaintiff Byron M.’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, finds as follows:

I. Standard

A court may issue a temporary restraining order if it determines: (1) the moving party will suffer irreparable injury if the relief is denied; (2) the moving party will probably prevail on the merits; (3) the balance of potential harm favors the moving party; and depending on the nature of the case, (4) the public interest favors granting relief. See International Jensen v. Metrosound U.S.A., 4 F.3d 819, 822 (9th Cir.1993).

Under the “alternative standard,” a party may obtain a temporary restraining order, by demonstrating either: (1) a combination of probable success on the merits and the possibility of irreparable injury if relief is not granted; or (2) the existence of serious questions going to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.