Berkla

Berkla v. Corel Corp.

Good Law
66 F. Supp. 2d 1129·1999 WL 742593·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14471
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 1999Civ. S-98-1159 GGHCalifornia11,767 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hollows, J.

ORDER

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

All art is but imitation of nature.

Taking Seneca’s admonition to heart, plaintiff, Dennis Berkla, .has established electronic databases (Garden Hose) containing virtual leaves, blades of grass, flowers, pine cones and the like which constitute a software “nozzle,” which is then digitally “sprayed” to create computerized, realistic pictures of plants, trees, forests, gardens on the computer screen. After supplying some of these databases to defendant Corel for possible inclusion in upcoming Corel software revisions, and after having had Corel reject Berkla’s submissions. Berkla became aware that Corel-DRAW 8, with its application program PHOTO-PAINT 8, contained database images similar to Berkla’s. Corel’s application program performed essentially the same tasks as set forth above. Berkla thereafter sued Corel (Second Amended Complaint) for:

1. Copyright Violation

a. the direct uploading of 79 Berkla files into Corel’s systems with subsequent dissemination to beta testers;

b. the individual components, e.g., leaves, grasses, branches, trunks, pine cones and so forth, of the Corel release were substantially similar to those in Garden Hose 1.5,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.