Landa

United States v. Landa

Good Law
281 F. Supp. 2d 1139·2003 WL 22132721·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21891
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2003CR 02-0220 WHACalifornia2,859 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alsup, J.

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

In this large-scale marijuana-cultivation case, this memorandum states the reasons for the sentencing decision. The defendants are Stephanie Landa, Kevin Gage, and Thomas Kikuchi, all residents of Southern California in their thirties or forties, as the case may be. Pursuant to plea agreements, they all pled guilty to maintaining a place for the manufacturing of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856 (a)(1). Via their plea agreements, all defendants waived all grounds for a motion for downward departure except as discussed below.

The offense arose out of a large indoor cultivation facility in San Francisco. The following brief summary is not in dispute. Defendants leased commercial space at 560 Brannan Street and used it to grow marijuana in four rooms on two levels, using 100-plus high-intensity electric grow lamps, an irrigation drip system, and chemicals and fertilizer. The enterprise obviously entailed considerable capital investment, time and energy. Defendants intended to recoup their investment, to repay lenders, and to help support themselves through sales of marijuana. On July 18, 2002, the San Francisco Police Department raided the facility,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.