Khosroabadi
Khosroabadi v. North Shore Agency
Opinion
Opinion
Huff, J.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIM WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND TERMINATING CASE
On September 15, 2005, Plaintiff Sara Khosroabadi (“Plaintiff’) filed a complaint alleging violations of state and federal debt collection practices laws against Defendant North Shore Agency (“Defendant”). (Doc. No. 1.) On June 6, 2006, Defendant filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) or alternatively for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, and for dismissal. (Doc. No. 17.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on June 23, 2006. (Doc. No. 21.) On July 6, 2006, Defendant filed a reply. (Doc. No. 22.) The Court held a hearing on July 17, 2006. Robert Hyde appeared for Plaintiff and Ernest Slome appeared for Defendant. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs first claim, DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over and therefore DISMISSES Plaintiffs second state law claim without prejudice, and TERMINATES the case.
Background
This action stems from a letter Defendant sent Plaintiff at her home address on April 27, 2005. (Compl. at 4.) Plaintiff alleges…