Petition of James Van De La Bogart for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Good Law
273 F.2d 194·1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3131
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 1959897California309 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petitioner, a prisoner confined in an Arizona penitentiary serving a sentence imposed by a court of that State, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. He sought the writ upon the ground that he had been denied a fair trial in the state court. The same question was presented in his original appeal to the Supreme Court of that State, State v. Van Bogart, 85 Ariz. 63 , 331 P.2d 597 . His complaint was based upon the fact that he was gagged during a portion of the proceedings in the trial court when the jury was being impaneled and the information read to the jury.

The court below heard the petitioner’s case, received oral and documentary evidence and made findings of fact and conclusions of law which in general were in accord with the decision of the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona, above cited, and dismissed the petition. Petitioner then sought in the district court leave to proceed in forma pauperis upon an appeal here; and leave was denied, the court certifying that the appeal was not taken in good faith.

Petitioner now seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis upon an appeal here and has filed an application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.