California v. Sutter Health System

Good Law
84 F. Supp. 2d 1057·2000 WL 194832·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 424
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 2000C99-03803 MMCCalifornia16,760 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chesney, J.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Before the Court is the motion of plaintiff State of California for preliminary injunction to enjoin the merger of defendant Alta Bates Medical Center (“Alta Bates”), owned by defendant Sutter Health System (“Sutter”), and defendant Summit Medical Center (“Summit”). The matter came on regularly for hearing on October 25, 26, 27, and November 1, 1999. Appearing for plaintiff State of California were Bill Lock-yer, Attorney General of the State of California; John Donhoff, Jr., Deputy Attorney General; Pamela Cole, Special Deputy Attorney General and Charles M. McGay, Special Deputy Attorney General. Appearing for defendants Sutter and Alta Bates were George T. Manning, Robert C. Jones, Adrian Wager-Zito and Toby G. Singer, of Jones, Day, Reavis & Rogue. Appearing for defendant Summit was Maureen McGuirl of Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May. The matter was deemed submitted as of November 10, 1999, upon receipt of final post-hearing filings.

Having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion as well as the evidence and arguments of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.