Adobe Systems Inc. v. One Stop Micro, Inc.

Good Law
2000 Daily Journal DAR 3079·84 F. Supp. 2d 1086·2000 WL 135256·53 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 2003·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 999
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 2000C 97-20980 JWCalifornia3,660 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ware, J.

AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket Nos. 94 and 189]

I. INTRODUCTION

On February 2, 1999, Defendant One Stop Micro, Inc. (“One Stop”) filed a motion for summary judgment and noticed it for hearing on March 8, 1999. On March 22, 1999, the Court conducted a hearing on the motion. The Court found it appropriate to take the matter under submission and ordered Plaintiff Adobe Systems, Inc. (“Adobe”) to file a cross motion for summary judgment. Adobe filed its cross motion for partial summary judgment on April 12,1999 and noticed it for hearing on May 17, 1999. The Court conducted a hearing on the cross motions on November 8, 1999. Based upon all papers filed to date and the oral argument of the parties, the Court denies Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and grants in part Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment.

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Adobe is a software development and publishing company. Adobe’s products include “Adobe PageMaker,” “Adobe Pho-toshop,” “Adobe Premiere,” and “Adobe Illustrator.” These programs are among the most successful graphics and desktop…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.