Alvarado-Torres

United States v. Alvarado-Torres

Good Law
45 F. Supp. 2d 986·1999 WL 236197·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8100
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 1999Crim. 98-3351-RCalifornia5,271 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rhoades, J.

AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS AND DISMISS INDICTMENT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION

I. Overview.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motions (1) to suppress her statements and (2) to dismiss the indictment, because she was not informed of her rights under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. For the reasons explained in this order, the motions are DENIED.

II. Background.

On October 24, 1998, Maria Alvarado Torres (“Defendant”) drove a 1980 Dodge Diplomat from Mexico to the Calexico Port of Entry. At primary inspection, a narcotic detector dog alerted agents to Defendant’s car. Defendant was referred to secondary inspection.

At secondary inspection, Defendant gave a negative customs declaration to Customs Inspector Alfred Garcia. In his initial inspection of the vehicle, Inspector Garcia noticed packages in the dashboard and rear quarter panels. Further inspection of the vehicle revealed 130.3 pounds of a green, leafy substance which field-tested positive for marijuana.

Agents thereafter placed Defendant under arrest and informed her, in Spanish, of her Miranda rights. She agreed to waive those rights and speak with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.