Films of Distinction, Inc. v. Allegro Film Productions, Inc.

Good Law
12 F. Supp. 2d 1068·1998 WL 372350·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17265
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 1, 1998CV 98-0609 RAP(RZX)California6,860 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paez, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIY.P. 12(b)(6)

I.

Introduction

Plaintiff Films of Distinction, Inc. d/b/a The Crime Channel (“Films of Distinction”) brings this action for trademark infringement, defamation and product disparagement against defendants Allegro Film Productions (“Allegro”), Norstar Entertainment, Inc. (“Norstar”), Republic Entertainment, Inc. (“Republic”), Showtime Networks, Inc. (“Showtime”) Westwind Productions Corporation (“Westwind Production”), and West-wind Releasing Corporation (‘Westwind Releasing”). Plaintiff owns a television network entitled “The Crime Channel.” Plaintiff alleges defendants used plaintiff’s service mark “The Crime Channel” in their motion picture about a young boy who watches a cable television station called “The Crime Channel.”

Pending before the Court is the motion of all defendants, with the exception of defendant Norstar, to dismiss plaintiffs claims for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Upon consideration of the parties’ papers submitted in conjunction with the motion, and the oral arguments of counsel, the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.