Cairns

Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.

Good Law
120 F. Supp. 2d 880·2000 WL 973551·56 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1514·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8739
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 22, 2000CV98-3847FMC(BQRX)California3,588 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paez, J.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REINSTATE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY CLAIM AND MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I.

Introduction

This action was originally assigned to Judge Richard A. Paez. Recently, however, with the appointment of Judge Paez to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, this case was randomly reassigned to Judge Florence Marie Cooper. While this case was pending before Judge Paez, the plaintiffs filed a Motion to Reinstate Right to Publicity Claim and for Preliminary Injunction. Judge Paez heard that motion on March 20, 2000, and at the conclusion of the hearing submitted the matter for decision. On May 2, 2000, Judge Paez entered an order summarily denying plaintiffs’ motion but indicated that he would file a more detailed memorandum explaining the basis for his ruling. Thus, Judge Paez now sets forth the reasons why plaintiffs’ motion to reinstate and for preliminary injunction were properly denied.

At the outset, the Court notes that when it dismissed plaintiffs’ right of publicity claim and denied the request for a preliminary injunction on October 16, 1999, it did so with a detailed summary of plaintiffs’ factual allegations and legal claims. Cairns v. Franklin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.