Visto Corp. v. Sproqit Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
445 F. Supp. 2d 1104·2006 WL 2237768·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56730
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 2006C-04-0651 EMC. (Docket Nos. 166, 168, and 177)California5,390 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chen, J.

ORDER RE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION — “WORKSPACE ELEMENT” AND “INDEPENDENTLY MODIFIABLE COPY”

Plaintiff Visto Corporation has sued Defendant Sproqit Technologies, Inc. for infringement of the '192, '708, '131, and '221 patents. The parties submitted ten terms or phrases to the Court for claim construction. A claim construction hearing was held on July 6, 2006. Having considered the parties briefs and accompanying submissions, the Court hereby issues this opinion to address the phrase “an independently modifiable copy of the first workspace element.” While the Court provides a construction for the term “independently modifiable copy,” for the reasons explained below, it rejects each party’s proposed construction for the term “workspace element,” provides a tentative construction to the parties, and orders the parties to further meet and confer to determine whether they can agree on the tentative construction or another similar construction. The Court shall subsequently issue an order addressing the remaining claim terms and phrases.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The four patents at issue are all related to data synchronization systems and methods.

A. '192 Patent

The '192 patent is titled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.