Nordberg

Nordberg v. Trilegiant Corp.

Good Law

445 F. Supp. 2d 1082·2006 WL 2038685·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15756

United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 2006C-05-3246-MHPCalifornia9,479 words

Opinion

Patel, J.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Motion to Dismiss

Plaintiffs Heather Nordberg, William Smith, Julie Butler, Faye E. Taber and Patricia Douglas-Warden brought this class action against defendants Trilegiant Corporation (“Trilegiant”) and its former parent corporation Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”), alleging in their first amended complaint: (1) violations of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. sections 1962 (c) and 1962(d); (2) violations of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (“EFTA”), 15 U.S.C. sections 1693 et seq.; (3) violations of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ.Code sections 1750 et seq.; (4) violations of California’s business practice laws, Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code sections 17200 and 17500 et seq.; (5) conversion; (6) unjust enrichment; and (7) declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2201 et seq.

Now before the court are two separate motions, filed by Trilegiant and Cendant, to dismiss portions of the complaint. Having considered the parties’ arguments and submissions and for the reasons set forth below, the court enters the following memorandum and order.

BACKGROUND

Trilegiant, a/k/a TRL Group, is a corporation organized…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.