Brayton Purcell LLP v. Recordon & Recordon

Good Law
361 F. Supp. 2d 1135·2005 WL 639706·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5122
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2005C-04-4995 EMCCalifornia4,353 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chen, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER OF VENUE (Docket No. 14).

On November 24, 2004, Plaintiff Brayton Purcell LLP, a law firm with its principal place of business in Novato, California, filed suit against Defendant Recordon & Recordon (hereinafter referred to as “R & R”), a small law firm operating solely in San Diego, California. R & R allegedly copied the entire text of Brayton Purcell’s website and incorporated the text into R & R’s own website. The claims asserted by Brayton Purcell are (1) copyright infringement, see 17 U.S.C. § 501 ; (2) unfair competition under both federal and state law, see 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 ; (3) false advertising, see Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code § 17500; and (4) common law misappropriation. Brayton Purcell has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and R & R a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or, in the alternative, transfer of venue.

Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby DENIES R & R’s motion to dismiss or transfer. As for Brayton Purcell’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.