Cusano

Cusano v. Klein

Good Law
280 F. Supp. 2d 1035·2003 WL 22077453·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20739
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2003CV 97-4914-AHM(EX)California3,932 words

Opinion

Opinion

Matz, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs second, third, fourth, fifth, ninth, and tenth claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation, conversion, and imposition of constructive trust. For the reasons elaborated below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.

MOTION STANDARDS

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) provides for summary judgment when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” The moving party bears the initial burden of demonstrating the absence of a “genuine issue of material fact for trial.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 256 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). A fact is material if it could affect the outcome of the suit under the governing substantive law. Id. at 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 . The burden then shifts to the nonmoving party to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.