Elsinore Christian Center v. City of Lake Elsinore
Opinion
Opinion
Wilson, J.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Elsinore Christian Center and Church member Gary Holmes (collectively “Church” or “Plaintiffs”) brought this action against Defendants the City of Lake Elsinore and five individual members of the City Council (collectively “City” or “Defendants”) after the Lake Elsinore Planning Commission denied the Church’s application for a conditional use permit (“CUP”) to operate a church on 217 N. Main Street, Lake Elsinore, California (the “Subject Property,” “Property,” or “Site”).
Now before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART as to Plaintiffs’ Second Cause of Action. The Court will issue a separate Order addressing the remaining portions of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Motion under Rule 56(f).
II. FACTUAL / PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Factual Summary
The Church is currently located in the downtown area of Lake Elsinore and believes…