Coach, Inc. v. ASIA PACIFIC TRADING COMPANY, INC.

Good Law
676 F. Supp. 2d 914·2009 WL 3808550·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110903
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 2009CV 09-35 PSG (PLAx)California6,462 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gutierrez, J.

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Adjudication regarding Defendant Sunglass Experts’ liability, GRANTING Defendant Sunglass Experts’ Motion for Summary Judgment regarding compensatory damages, and GRANTING Defendant Mirage’s and Defendant David Hsu’s Motion for Summary Judgment regarding liability

Wendy K. Hernandez, Deputy Clerk.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Adjudication Re Plaintiffs’ Trademark Infringement Claim Against Defendant Sunglass Experts, Inc.; Defendant Sunglass Experts, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Compensatory Damages; and, Defendant Mirage Eyewear, Inc.’s and Defendant David Hsu’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Liability. These matters came on for hearing on November 2, 2009. After considering the moving and opposing papers, as well as oral argument, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs’ motion, GRANTS Defendant Sunglass Experts, Inc.’s motion, and GRANTS Defendant Mirage Eyewear, Inc.’s and Defendant David Hsu’s motion.

I. Factual Background

Plaintiffs Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. (collectively, “Coach” or “Plaintiffs”) are in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.