Silicon Valley Bank v. New Hampshire Insurance

Good Law
203 F. Supp. 2d 1152·2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9842
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 30, 200200CV6096(RSWL), 00CV13207(RSWL)California2,966 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lew, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Presently before the Court are the following Motions: (1) Defendants New Hampshire Insurance Company and AIG Europe (UK) Limited’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Dismissing Plaintiffs Second Claim for Relief; (2) Plaintiff Silicon Valley Bank’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re: Defendants’ Third Affirmative Defense; (3) Plaintiff Silicon Valley Bank’s Request for Judicial Notice; and (4) Defendants New Hampshire Insurance Company and AIG Europe (UK) Limited’s Request for Judicial Notice. These matters were scheduled to be heard on December 17, 2001, but were taken off calendar pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for disposition based on the papers filed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS both Requests for Judicial Notice. The Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Second Claim for Relief. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendants’ Third Affirmative Defense.

I. BACKGROUND

This is an action for breach of contract regarding an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.