Rosa
Rosa v. CITY OF SEASIDE
Opinion
Opinion
Fogel, J.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs Evelyn and Robert Rosa (“Plaintiffs”) brought the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , California Civil Code § 52.1 et seq., and California tort law on behalf of themselves and their deceased son, Michael Rosa. All claims have been dismissed except for Plaintiffs’ tort claims against Defendant TASER International, Inc. (“TASER”). Plaintiffs allege that a TASER-manufactured Electronic Control Device (“ECD”) was a substantial contributing factor in their son’s death and that TASER either is strictly liable for or was negligent in failing to warn of the danger posed by its product. Discovery is complete, and the matter is set for trial. TASER moves for summary judgment as to the claims asserted against it. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
1. August 29, 2004
Michael Rosa (“Rosa”) lived with Plaintiffs, his parents, in Del Ray Oaks, California. At approximately 11:00 P.M. on August 29, 2004, one of Plaintiffs’ neighbors called the police to report a disturbance in the area. The neighbor told the police dispatcher that “somebody [was] walking up…