Harvey Aluminum v. International Longshoremen's And Warehousemen's Union, Local 8

Good Law
278 F.2d 63·3 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 139·46 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2205·1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4604
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 196016542_1California344 words

Opinion

Opinion

278 F.2d 63 HARVEY ALUMINUM, a corporation, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S AND WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION, LOCAL 8; and International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Appellees. No. 16542. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 11, 1960. Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra, Sam Speerstra, Salem, Or., for appellant. Gladstein, Andersen, Leonard & Sibbett, San Francisco, Cal., Pozzi & Wilson, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before POPE and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN, District Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 Appellant as plaintiff below brought this action against the appellees alleging in its complaint that this action 'arises under the laws of the United States regulating commerce, and more particularly under 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 (29 U.S.C.A. 187).' It was based upon a claim that defendants had been guilty of certain acts amounting to secondary boycott resulting in damage to plaintiff. Plaintiff demanded judgment for three million dollars, general damages, three million dollars, punitive damages, and thirty-five thousand dollars, attorneys' fees. Defendants moved to strike from the complaint the allegations and the portion of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.