John L. v. Superior Court

Bad Law
14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 261·33 Cal. 4th 158·91 P.3d 205
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 17, 2004S098158California11,489 words

Opinion

Opinion

Effective March 8, 2000, the Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Initiative (Prop. 21, Primary Elec. (Mar. 7, 2000)) (Proposition 21) amended Welfare and Institutions Code section 777. [1] Section 777, subdivision (a)(2) (section 777(a)(2)) establishes the juvenile court procedure for finding probation violations and modifying prior dispositions when new misconduct is committed by those on probation for crimes previously adjudicated under section 602.

As we recently explained in In re Eddie M. (2003) 31 Cal.4th 480, 494-502 , 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 119 , 73 P.3d 1115 ( Eddie M. ), former section 777 could be used to find a new criminal violation by one already a probationer under section 602, and thus to increase the person's maximum term of juvenile confinement. Accordingly, case law established that the new misconduct adjudicated under former section 777 must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt by evidence competent in a criminal trial. ( In re Arthur N. (1976) 16 Cal.3d 226, 234-240 , 127 Cal.Rptr. 641 , 545 P.2d 1345 ( Arthur N. ).)

However, Proposition 21 prevents use of section 777(a)(2) to produce new criminal adjudications and to thereby increase the maximum…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.