Alvarez

Redevelopment Agency of San Bernardino v. Alvarez

Good Law
288 F. Supp. 2d 1112·2003 WL 22427779·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18875
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 2003ED CV 02-142 RT(SGLx)California1,715 words

Opinion

Opinion

Timlin, J.

ORDER (1) REMANDING THE COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST COUNTER-DEFENDANT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CROSS-CLAIM AGAINST CROSS-DEFENDANT CITY OF SAN BERNARDI-NO; AND (2) DENYING THE MOTION BY COUNTERDEFENDANT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND CROSS-DEFENDANT CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO DISMISS THE COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6)

The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered counterdefendant Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino (“RDA”)’s and Cross-defendant City of San Bernardino (“City”)’s (“Counterdefendant”)’s motion to dismiss Counterclaimants/cross-claimants Raymundo Lopez (“Lopez”), Christina Speer (“Speer”) Antonio Yniguez (“Yniguez”), Carmen Sanchez (“C.Sanchez”), Manuel Sanchez (“M.Sanchez”), and Guillermina Jiminez (“Jiminez”) (“ Counterclaim-ants/Cross-claimants”)’s counterclaim and cross-claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”), Counterclaimant/Cross-claimants’ opposition, and the RDA’s and City’s reply. Based on such considerations, the court concludes as follows:

I.

BACKGROUND

The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) acquired…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.