Cuppy

Telephia, Inc. v. Cuppy

Good Law
411 F. Supp. 2d 1178·2006 WL 249521·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5923
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 2006C 04-03508 SICalifornia8,226 words

Opinion

Opinion

Illston, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On January 27, 2006, the Court heard argument on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Having carefully considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, and for good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS IN PART plaintiffs motion and DENIES defendants’ motion.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff in this matter, Telephia, Inc., is a company in the “wireless market intelligence business,” an industry that “provides market intelligence information to wireless service (cell phone) providers.” Second Am. Compl., ¶¶ 4,13; Def. Answer, ¶ 13. Telephia’s services include “colleet[ing] and analyzing] data on cell phone usage for wireless service providers to help them track the performance of their programs, drive adoption and usage of their programs, and make investment decisions.” Second Am. Compl., ¶ 4. In 1999, defendant Steven Cuppy formed Criterion Wireless Corp. (“Criterion”), a competitor of Telephia. Def. Counterclaims, ¶ 7. Defendants Scott McCulley and David Simon joined Criterion shortly thereafter as shareholders. Id. Collectively,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.