Schneider

Schneider v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
91 F. Supp. 2d 1316·2000 WL 343000·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4199
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2000C 96-1739 SICalifornia5,787 words

Opinion

Opinion

Illston, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

On February 11, 2000, the Court heard argument on a motion for summary judgment by defendant C.A. Terhune, Director of the California Department of Corrections (“CDC”) and a motion for preliminary injunction by plaintiffs. Having carefully considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction.

BACKGROUND

1. Procedural History

Plaintiffs are fifteen current and former California inmates who have brought a § 1983 action against defendants California Department of Corrections (“CDC”), James Gomez, former Director of the CDC, and C.A. Terhune, current Director of the CDC. Plaintiffs allege that defendants committed an unconstitutional taking and violated prisoners’ equal protection rights by failing to pay interest on funds deposited by prisoners in Inmate Trust Accounts (“ITAs”).

On March 24, 1997, this Court held that plaintiffs did not possess a property interest in the interest income earned on money placed in ITAs and dismissed plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.