Reilly

Reilly v. Hearst Corp.

Good Law
107 F. Supp. 2d 1192·2000 WL 1175077·28 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2222·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11625
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 2000C-00-0119-VRWCalifornia11,470 words

Opinion

Opinion

Walker, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

In this private antitrust case, plaintiff challenges two transactions involving the general circulation daily newspapers in San Francisco. The publishers of the city’s two major dailies have reached an agreement pursuant to which Hearst Corporation, publisher of the San Francisco Examiner, will acquire Chronicle Publishing Corporation’s San Francisco Chronicle. The antitrust ramifications of this transaction and a companion deal involving the future of the Examiner were the subject of a trial to the court on May 1-5, 9-12 and 15. The court now makes its findings of fact and draws conclusions of law.

PARTIES

Plaintiff Clint Reilly is a real estate investor, former professional political campaign manager/consultant and unsuccessful candidate for mayor of San Francisco in the 1999 municipal elections. Reilly is a subscriber to the San Francisco Chronicle newspaper and a purchaser of single copies of the San Francisco Examiner newspaper.

Defendant The Hearst Corporation (Hearst) is a New York City-based media company engaged in newspaper, magazine and book publishing, television broadcasting and ranching, among other businesses. Hearst was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.