Zurich

Zurich Specialties London Ltd. v. Bickerstaff, Whatley, Ryan & Burkhalter, Inc.

Good Law
650 F. Supp. 2d 1064·2009 WL 2827969
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2009CV 08-07066 SJO (FFMx)California4,072 words

Opinion

Opinion

Otero, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Docket No. 28]

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Zurich Specialties London Limited’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed July 23, 2009. Defendant Bickerstaff, Whatley, Ryan & Burkhalter, Inc. (“Bickerstaff’) filed an Opposition, to which Plaintiff replied. The Court found this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for August 17, 2009. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

Caduceus Self Insurance Fund, Inc. (“Caduceus”) was a Florida not-for-profit corporation which formed and operated a medical malpractice self insurance fund to pool the medical malpractice liabilities of its members. (Uncontroverted Fact (“UF”) No. I. ) Caduceus employed Spear, Safer, Harmon & Co., P.A. (collectively, “Spear Safer”) as its accountant to audit its financial statements from 1994 through 1998. (UF No. 2.) Caduceus also retained Biekerstaff, an actuarial services firm, to perform rate level studies beginning in 1993, and to provide year end reserve analyses, beginning with a report on the 1994 calendar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.