Schulthies

Schulthies v. National Passenger Rr Corp.

Good Law
650 F. Supp. 2d 994·2009 WL 2524580·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72423
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 2009C 08-5538 CWCalifornia3,826 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilken, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants National Passenger Railroad Corporation (AMTRAK), Joseph W. Deely and Steven Shelton move to dismiss all claims in Plaintiff Mark K. Schulthies’ complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff opposes the motion, except in regard to two of the claims against Defendants Deely and Shelton. The matter was heard on July 16, 2009. Having considered all of the papers filed by the parties and oral argument on the motion, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion with leave for Plaintiff to amend his complaint.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff alleges the following in his complaint. Plaintiff was employed by AMTRAK, a public entity organized and created by the United States, from February, 1992 to January 10, 2007. On October 29, 2006, Plaintiff sent an e-mail to Eugene Skoropowski, Managing Director of the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA). The e-mail requested that Mr. Skoropowski investigate the danger to the public of AMTRAK’s decision to reorganize AMTRAK Engineer work locations between the Bay Area and Bakersfield which would allow one engineer to operate a train, as opposed to two engineers. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.