Jacobson

Jacobson v. Schwarzenegger

Good Law
650 F. Supp. 2d 1032·2009 WL 2633762·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75747
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 2009Case CV 04-3629-JFW (JTL)California16,786 words

Opinion

Opinion

Walter, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56 is granted; (2) plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56 is denied; and (3) judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice as to Claim Twelve and without prejudice as to Claims Thirteen and Eighteen.

AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court submits this Amended Report and Recommendation to the Honorable John F. Walter, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

INTRODU CTION

On May 21, 2004, plaintiff Eric Jacobson (“plaintiff’ or “Jacobson”), a licensed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.