Garcia

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Garcia

Good Law
127 F. Supp. 2d 1305·2000 WL 33141214·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18954
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 200000-09292 CM (SHx)California705 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moreno, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Having read the supporting papers and having heard oral argument, the Court hereby grants Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.

I.

Discussion

A. Factual Background

On August 25, 2000, Defendants Sanae Garcia and Brian Garcia resigned from Merrill Lynch and immediately began working at Merrill Lynch’s competitor Sa-lomon Smith Barney, Inc. (“Smith Barney”). Following their departure, Plaintiffs contacted some of their former clients at Merrill Lynch to inform them of their change of employment. See Schweitzer Suppl. Decl. at Ex. A. Also on August 25, a Smith Barney vice president wrote to some of Merrill Lynch’s customers and provided them with documentation to transfer their accounts to Smith Barney. See Schweitzer Suppl. Decl. at Ex. B.

B. Analysis

In the Ninth Circuit, a party may obtain preliminary injunction relief by sastisfying one of two tests. The traditional test requires “1) a strong likelihood of success on the merits, 2) the possibility of irreparable injury to plaintiff if the preliminary relief is not granted, 3) a balance of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.